Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10C8F10CD8 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88305 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2013 15:26:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 87406 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2013 15:26:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 86580 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2013 15:26:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:26:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,SPF_NEUTRAL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: encountered temporary error during SPF processing of domain of urciolo2@gmail.com) Received: from [216.139.250.139] (HELO joe.nabble.com) (216.139.250.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:26:18 +0000 Received: from [192.168.236.139] (helo=joe.nabble.com) by joe.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Um3y4-0000ov-WB for users@activemq.apache.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 08:25:13 -0700 Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 08:24:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Greenbean To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1370877897982-4668051.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1370530298542-4667966.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1370530298542-4667966.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: Re: CMS 3.6 Socket Descriptor Leak With Failover MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Another bit of information I can provide regarding the problem. Reversing the order of the task adds to the taskRunner in FailoverTransport.cpp seems to cause the CloseTransportsTask to execute during reconnects. The attached image shows the code change. Any ideas why this is the case? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/CMS-3-6-Socket-Descriptor-Leak-With-Failover-tp4667966p4668051.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.