activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
Subject Re: DemandForwardingBridge - Ignoring sub ConsumerInf
Date Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:46:47 GMT
Hi,

there will be no any negative effects. Just, as there are only two brokers
in the network there's no any reason to have ttl set to 3 (and debug
message just saying it will ignore unnecessary subs).

>From the exceptions you're seeing looks like you have an unstable network
connection and are not related to this setting.

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
----------------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosanac@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/


On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:39 PM, mmg <manjusha.gole@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Dejan,
>
> Thanks for a quick reply.
>
> We have two brokers in on two different Linux host and the networkTTL is
> set
> to 3.
>
> Network connector on broker A
> <networkConnector conduitSubscriptions=&quot;false&quot;
> dynamicOnly=&quot;false&quot; failover=&quot;true&quot;
> name=&quot;brokerB&quot; networkTTL=&quot;3&quot;
> uri=&quot;static:(ssl://&lt;IP of host
> B>:61617?wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration=600000)"/>
>
>
> Network connector on broker B
> <networkConnector conduitSubscriptions=&quot;false&quot;
> dynamicOnly=&quot;false&quot; failover=&quot;true&quot;
> name=&quot;brokerA&quot; networkTTL=&quot;3&quot;
> uri=&quot;static:(ssl://&lt;IP of host
> A>:61617?wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration=600000)"/>
>
>
>
> I did not understand what kind of negative effect will be there? Could you
> please give some example?
>
> In this setup, we also observe java.io.EOFException after every hour (below
> are log messages) in activemq.log on host A. What could be possible reasons
> for this exception? Should we be worried about this exception?
>
> 2013-05-29 23:00:04,637 [127.0.0.1:36760] DEBUG WireFormatNegotiator
> - tcp:///127.0.0.1:36760 before negotiation: OpenWireFormat{version=1,
> cacheEnabled=false, stackTraceEnabled=false, tightEncodingEnabled=false,
> sizePrefixDisabled=false}
> 2013-05-29 23:00:04,637 [127.0.0.1:36760] DEBUG WireFormatNegotiator
> - tcp:///127.0.0.1:36760 after negotiation: OpenWireFormat{version=1,
> cacheEnabled=true, stackTraceEnabled=true, tightEncodingEnabled=true,
> sizePrefixDisabled=false}
> 2013-05-29 23:00:04,698 [127.0.0.1:36760] DEBUG AbstractRegion
> - Adding destination:
> topic://ActiveMQ.Advisory.Producer.Topic.com.avaya.coreservice.um.USERS
> 2013-05-29 23:00:08,738 [127.0.0.1:36760] DEBUG Transport
> - Transport failed: java.io.EOFException
> java.io.EOFException
>         at java.io.DataInputStream.readInt(Unknown Source)
>         at
>
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.unmarshal(OpenWireFormat.java:274)
>         at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run(TcpTransport.java:142)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
> 2013-05-29 23:01:01,171 [Duration=600000] DEBUG WireFormatNegotiator
> - Sending: WireFormatInfo { version=1,
> properties={TightEncodingEnabled=true, TcpNoDelayEnabled=true,
> SizePrefixDisabled=false, StackTraceEnabled=true,
> MaxInactivityDuration=600000, CacheEnabled=true}, magic=[A,c,t,i,v,e,M,Q]}
> 2013-05-29 23:01:01,171 [127.0.0.1:36910] DEBUG TcpTransport
> - TCP consumer thread starting
> 2013-05-29 23:01:01,171 [127.0.0.1:36910] DEBUG WireFormatNegotiator
> - Received WireFormat: WireFormatInfo { version=1,
> properties={StackTraceEnabled=true, TightEncodingEnabled=true,
> TcpNoDelayEnabled=true, SizePrefixDisabled=false,
> MaxInactivityDuration=30000, CacheEnabled=true}, magic=[A,c,t,i,v,e,M,Q]}
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DemandForwardingBridge-Ignoring-sub-ConsumerInf-tp4668211p4668215.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message