activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Johan Edstrom <seij...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: activeMQ clustering (integrated with JBoss)
Date Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:04:19 GMT
Activemq doesn't do "shared store"
The first machine to attach will lock the db and the second will wait in failover mode.

On Jun 20, 2013, at 12:50, deepak_a <angeshwar@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks!
> I can confirm that my brokers are able to Discover each other.
> 
> 
> But from your earlier statements
> 'you'll won't be able to share databases'
> 'they would all have their own persistence stores'
> 
> I see no reason why this won't work - so is this something not-recommended
> by activeMQ? becuase of locking/performance issues?
> 
> As I mentioned earlier my intention is to let both the brokers running 
> 
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Clustered-JBoss-and-JDBC-Master-Slave-td2348023.html#a2348028
> My design is similar to the diagram in the above link.
> 
> Only difference in instead of finding a master, (load balance r will ensure
> that) messages are sent to both the brokers when they are healthy.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/activeMQ-clustering-integrated-with-JBoss-tp4668358p4668426.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message