activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Timothy Bish <tabish...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ActiveMQ-CPP v3.7.0 : how to close a connection blocked inside a start() when using failover
Date Fri, 07 Jun 2013 15:32:14 GMT
On 06/07/2013 11:27 AM, Chris wrote:
> Hi Timothy,
>
> Thanks for your quick reply. I tried using stop(), but got the same
> result... i appears the mutex gets deleted, and this result in the r6025
> failure, since synchronisable object is an abstract class.
>
> Are you aware of any other method to abort the start() at the moment? (a
> workaround that would allow me to close() the connection later on)
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-CPP-v3-7-0-how-to-close-a-connection-blocked-inside-a-start-when-using-failover-tp4667937p4668008.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Not sure, you'd have to look into the code, I can't remember if there is 
any timeouts that apply to this case.

-- 
Tim Bish
Sr Software Engineer | RedHat Inc.
tim.bish@redhat.com | www.fusesource.com | www.redhat.com
skype: tabish121 | twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/

www.camelone.org : The open source integration conference:


Mime
View raw message