activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From deepak_a <angesh...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: activeMQ clustering (integrated with JBoss)
Date Thu, 20 Jun 2013 16:50:08 GMT
Thanks!
I can confirm that my brokers are able to Discover each other.


But from your earlier statements
'you'll won't be able to share databases'
'they would all have their own persistence stores'

I see no reason why this won't work - so is this something not-recommended
by activeMQ? becuase of locking/performance issues?

As I mentioned earlier my intention is to let both the brokers running 

http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Clustered-JBoss-and-JDBC-Master-Slave-td2348023.html#a2348028
My design is similar to the diagram in the above link.

Only difference in instead of finding a master, (load balance r will ensure
that) messages are sent to both the brokers when they are healthy.



--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/activeMQ-clustering-integrated-with-JBoss-tp4668358p4668426.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message