Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5814910B5F for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 17:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94077 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2013 17:02:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 94043 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2013 17:02:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 94035 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2013 17:02:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 May 2013 17:02:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of seijoed@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.175] (HELO mail-ia0-f175.google.com) (209.85.210.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 May 2013 17:02:19 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f175.google.com with SMTP id i38so629446iae.6 for ; Thu, 02 May 2013 10:01:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=iqSZpBPRcAw+sPenAD67BWJ4Oojv69qcCPaYIpeKhvg=; b=e14M9kFKC9Sl0bVqRVmHJePepZYHTsOdIgwp4mUhtYUZSDHU77gyWkfZOgtFnv+0kQ l5k8+AAZSScFrxa72x2XdpimbQftKW7AiPcUecpO8DsbLhZ5IgrooEmuth19bmdk9zjk s3lHSOKPeFW1r1DSTnTwOyIYnsFbHPlvCHRVWr6bnfXr5JO70mOY0ipQT2AUcEx3ZuvT 87Jsw4J7DSEMq8tQZOcdUojdHiUMu6GJEoP9gUFMdAq98z5kSvYMGV/LDlkT9cEoz/e6 jmZPlwxtWpSX7q4+vGKMJgRpHSSakOzZyoHNclOIQ3Jl9CbSzDxlL7nxUJqpdPfZU3pY sR9g== X-Received: by 10.50.25.36 with SMTP id z4mr4319714igf.33.1367514118411; Thu, 02 May 2013 10:01:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.15.40] (184-96-230-199.hlrn.qwest.net. [184.96.230.199]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wx2sm9197152igb.4.2013.05.02.10.01.56 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 02 May 2013 10:01:56 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) Subject: Re: AMQ failover using different PCs? From: Johan Edstrom In-Reply-To: <1367513950060-4666591.post@n4.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 11:01:49 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1367497133404-4666568.post@n4.nabble.com> <1367513950060-4666591.post@n4.nabble.com> To: users@activemq.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It is one of the better options, otherwise you are stuck with an RDMBS or a clustering filesystem. LevelDB in very new development offer some new cool stuff. On May 2, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Killhoven wrote: > Thanks! >=20 > This option is definitely doable, but not the best solution. Is there = any > other way to set up two stand-alone PC-s with AMQ, a master and slave = ?=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > View this message in context: = http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-failover-using-different-PCs-tp4= 666568p4666591.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.