Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of christian.posta@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.217.180 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1366937452679-4666232.post@n4.nabble.com>
References: <1366843173742-4666180.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<CAKS7T5Pw=pWXJv1PhtwJ2VFXYSw4gXd_P0-LRmi8VL=KXYt2Sg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1366937452679-4666232.post@n4.nabble.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 07:02:52 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAKS7T5MRegfcLedyS-jS_xKKLVeZhRG6-NLLCHmMrSN5_eSFkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: queue vs topic
From: Christian Posta <christian.posta@gmail.com>
To: "users@activemq.apache.org" <users@activemq.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01494232b56ee304db43fd47

--089e01494232b56ee304db43fd47
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

If consumers "share" the stream of messages, ie, each gets a message from
the stream, then use a queue.


On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 5:50 PM, webber <tokomakoma123@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you for reply.
>
> Please let me explain background of this question.
>
> I am designing enterprise integration architecture using activemq to
> communicate
> multiple systems in a company.
> Initially, I designed to put queues among systems. But from the point of
> view of
> flexibility I came to think of topic is better. Using queue and new system
> is added,
> we have to add a new queue and copy message in it.
>
> I am assuming multiple independent consumers share the same stream of
> messages
> and numbers of consumers are less than 10. messages should be persisted.
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/queue-vs-topic-tp4666180p4666232.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>


-- 
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta

--089e01494232b56ee304db43fd47--