Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 592E110424 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25158 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2013 18:52:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 25122 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2013 18:52:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 25075 invoked by uid 99); 30 Apr 2013 18:52:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:52:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.139.250.139] (HELO joe.nabble.com) (216.139.250.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:52:14 +0000 Received: from [192.168.236.139] (helo=joe.nabble.com) by joe.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UXFeG-0007Vn-SL for users@activemq.apache.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:51:32 -0700 Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:51:32 -0700 (PDT) From: fenbers To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <518012D4.9090201@noaa.gov> In-Reply-To: References: <1367337750599-4666470.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Is AMQ-4118 really fixed?? Doubt it... MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_190938_32877151.1367347892871" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_190938_32877151.1367347892871 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I would LOVE to help, but I would have no idea how to replicate the problem.  If I could replicate the problem, I'd know what I needed to do to solve or work-around it.  The tests you pointed me to probably do eliminate the cause of that issue, but the problem probably is triggered by other unanticipated factors.  Based on the fact that not all my log files are being cleaned up, I'd venture to guess my issue is a configuration problem or some obscure faux pas in my client code. I'm not sure how to help you help me! Mark On 4/30/2013 12:53 PM, ceposta [via ActiveMQ] wrote: If you could put together a test we can get to the bottom of it. Looks like Gary put together these tests to show AMQ-4118 was solved: https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/usecases/DurableSubsOfflineSelectorConcurrentConsumeIndexUseTest.java?r=1400317 On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:02 AM, fenbers < [hidden email] > wrote: > Regarding https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4118 , the report says > this issue is fixed in 5.8.0, but I am running 5.8.0 and still have exactly > the same 3 stack traces as listed in the URL above.  Moreover, I have > numbered .log files (journal files) that never get cleaned up > automatically. > These average about every 7th file or so that does not get removed.  TRACE > log entries indicate that two of the topics (of 5 total topics) are the > culprits, but I cannot figure out why.  I have been trying to resolve this > for a year now!!  I've traced my code for the 3 topics that don't leave > complaints vs the 2 topics that do leave complaints and I can't see any > functional differences in my code. > > I'm at a loss!  I'm currently running 5.8.0... > > Mark > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Is-AMQ-4118-really-fixed-Doubt-it-tp4666470.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- *Christian Posta* http://www.christianposta.com/blog twitter: @christianposta http://www.christianposta.com/blog If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Is-AMQ-4118-really-fixed-Doubt-it-tp4666470p4666474.html To unsubscribe from Is AMQ-4118 really fixed?? Doubt it..., click here . NAML mark_fenbers.vcf (360 bytes) -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Is-AMQ-4118-really-fixed-Doubt-it-tp4666470p4666477.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------=_Part_190938_32877151.1367347892871--