Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: SledgeHammer <grosin@firstam.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Message-ID: <1366929015402-4666231.post@n4.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <002701ce4200$6640d080$32c27180$@com>
References: <1366923592275-4666219.post@n4.nabble.com>
 <51799A79.4020808@gmail.com> <1366925226656-4666223.post@n4.nabble.com>
 <001901ce41fc$1b56cb00$52046100$@com>
 <1366926182082-4666225.post@n4.nabble.com>
 <002701ce4200$6640d080$32c27180$@com>
Subject: RE: Is this possible with ActiveMQ?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I have 1 machine acting as server / broker and currently 20 VMs acting as
clients. Will eventually ramp up to 400. Producers may submit anywhere from
1 job at a time to thousands. I think we are going to have 1 producer that
runs "full time" as a go-forward process and then any number of producers
for tests / one offs, etc. I really don't think theres going to be more then
a few producers at any given time, but you never know...

I'm doing this in C# / NMS, so the API is pretty limited, I hope I can get
the advisory stuff working, but my boss is happy with the 1 producer = 1
queue thing so we can round robin it...


--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Is-this-possible-with-ActiveMQ-tp4666219p4666231.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.