activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christian Posta <christian.po...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Is AMQ-4118 really fixed?? Doubt it...
Date Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:52:43 GMT
If you could put together a test we can get to the bottom of it. Looks like
Gary put together these tests to show AMQ-4118 was solved:


https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/usecases/DurableSubsOfflineSelectorConcurrentConsumeIndexUseTest.java?r=1400317


On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:02 AM, fenbers <Mark.Fenbers@noaa.gov> wrote:

> Regarding https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4118, the report says
> this issue is fixed in 5.8.0, but I am running 5.8.0 and still have exactly
> the same 3 stack traces as listed in the URL above.  Moreover, I have
> numbered .log files (journal files) that never get cleaned up
> automatically.
> These average about every 7th file or so that does not get removed.  TRACE
> log entries indicate that two of the topics (of 5 total topics) are the
> culprits, but I cannot figure out why.  I have been trying to resolve this
> for a year now!!  I've traced my code for the 3 topics that don't leave
> complaints vs the 2 topics that do leave complaints and I can't see any
> functional differences in my code.
>
> I'm at a loss!  I'm currently running 5.8.0...
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Is-AMQ-4118-really-fixed-Doubt-it-tp4666470.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message