Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of christian.posta@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.215.50 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1363880332718-4665014.post@n4.nabble.com>
References: <1363880332718-4665014.post@n4.nabble.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 09:07:21 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAKS7T5NM_wZzKjcFZymOa8atKcSPJ3WD2oXrQ6c8ubtFEfKXQA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed
From: Christian Posta <christian.posta@gmail.com>
To: "users@activemq.apache.org" <users@activemq.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba308e5095af5404d871888e

--90e6ba308e5095af5404d871888e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

How many messages did you try?
THere is a btree for each priority level (low, default, high) in kahadb, so
I don't think you can rely on the ordering in a particular range


On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:38 AM, mikmela <mikmela@yahoo.com> wrote:

> The  http://activemq.apache.org/how-can-i-support-priority-queues.html
> <http://activemq.apache.org/how-can-i-support-priority-queues.html>  says
> that
> *For KahaDB three priority levels are supported, Low (<5), Default (=5) and
> High (>5).*.
> However, our tests show that messages with different priorities in the
> range
> < 5 (Low) where processed by consumer in proper order, not FIFO as we
> thought... Does it mean that desription is not uup-do-date and it was
> addressed at some point?
> Just want to make sure that we can rely on this behaviour and it not a some
> side effect?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Clarifcation-on-KahaDB-support-for-message-priority-is-needed-tp4665014.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>


-- 
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta

--90e6ba308e5095af5404d871888e--