Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of christian.posta@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.215.44 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1363613658987-4664825.post@n4.nabble.com>
References: <1363613658987-4664825.post@n4.nabble.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:07:07 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAKS7T5Mu6_kF=89C63q=Xt+PABKkUBsSbsCYJFgKB_LQGgKA_g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Camel & ActiveMQ
From: Christian Posta <christian.posta@gmail.com>
To: "users@activemq.apache.org" <users@activemq.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c34c8aac9c8704d8345719

--001a11c34c8aac9c8704d8345719
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

No performance impact. The component will use the factory under the covers.


On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Bipin Jethwani <jethwani.bipin@gmail.com>wrote:

> I have jaasAuthenticationPlugin defined for my embedded activemq broker
> instance (and it is working fine), and then I have camel context defined
> with activemq component exposing many beans for remote invocation.
> Now I noticed from other posts here that there are two ways to make camel
> authenticate to broker,
> 1.      Setting username/password in ActiveMQComponent
> 2.      Setting username/password in ActiveMQConnectionFactory
> My question is how does both the options differs, is the any performance
> impact.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> -Bipin
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Camel-ActiveMQ-tp4664825.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>


-- 
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta

--001a11c34c8aac9c8704d8345719--