Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 878F5F970 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 08:04:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30034 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2013 08:04:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 29987 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2013 08:04:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 29968 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2013 08:04:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 08:04:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,SPF_SOFTFAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of aler2@yandex.ru does not designate 216.139.250.139 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.250.139] (HELO joe.nabble.com) (216.139.250.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 08:03:57 +0000 Received: from [192.168.236.139] (helo=joe.nabble.com) by joe.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UIaTI-00074E-Kc for users@activemq.apache.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 01:03:36 -0700 Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 01:03:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Alexander To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1363853016631-4664998.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <22a01f03.18fdf.13d8560af49.Coremail.suonayi2006@163.com> References: <1363690375132-4664879.post@n4.nabble.com> <22a01f03.18fdf.13d8560af49.Coremail.suonayi2006@163.com> Subject: Re: Re:load balancing for a few identical queues MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Many thanks )) I found post with identical approach, when using alone queue with a few consumers. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/load-balancing-for-a-few-identical-queues-tp4664879p4664998.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.