activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christian Posta <christian.po...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: load balancing
Date Wed, 13 Mar 2013 01:09:59 GMT
not sure what you mean with 3 nob's. you said earlier a two node network of
brokers.
do your producers/consumers use the failover url with random=true?


On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Geurt Schimmel <
GSchimmel@schubergphilis.com> wrote:

> random=false. Actually, static bridges between 3 nob's, and to prevent
> undesirable network pathes when all nodes are up, I'm using random=false.
>
> Geurt
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 13 mrt. 2013, at 01:41, "Christian Posta" <christian.posta@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I suppose you're using the failover URLs with random=true for all
> clients?
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Geurt Schimmel <
> > GSchimmel@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm sending 100k messages of 200 bytes each to a network-of-brokers (2
> >> nodes). Appears the load-balancing distribution is 83 vs 17. Guess this
> is
> >> the most effective way (from an ActiveMQ perspective) to process all the
> >> messages, but there are situations where a more equal loadbalancing
> would
> >> be preferable. Are there parameters or ways to influence the
> loadbalancing
> >> behavior ?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Geurt
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Christian Posta*
> > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > twitter: @christianposta
>



-- 
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message