activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Performance in 5.8.0 vs 5.2.0
Date Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:45:03 GMT
I think this is a change in the persistence adapter, we now sync by default
on every send, the jms durability guarantee. Use <kahaDB
enableJournalDiskSyncs="false"
.. > to get the same behaviour as 5.2. I think 5.2 would only sync on a
transaction boundary.


On 27 March 2013 09:43, Martin Fredriksson <ghart.fredriksson@gmail.com>wrote:

> I recently upgraded our ActiveMQ version from 5.2.0 to 5.8.0 and after that
> we experience a drop in performance. In particular when sending persisted
> messages to a queue.
>
> I have used Apache JMeter to get some benchmark values with a JMS
> Publisher,
> sending 5000 text messages to a queue.
> With ActiveMQ 5.2.0 this takes about 500 ms
> With ActiveMQ 5.8.0 this takes about 20000 ms
> If I turn off persistance, it takes about 150 ms with both versions.
>
> Is anyone else having the same problems? While running JMeter I used
> default
> configuration with both versions.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Performance-in-5-8-0-vs-5-2-0-tp4665179.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
http://redhat.com
http://blog.garytully.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message