activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Clarifcation on KahaDB support for message priority is needed
Date Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:42:32 GMT
prefetch is relevant here. the pending cursor on the client has priority
support[0-9] so x prefetched messages with priority [0-5] will get
reordered on the client.
with prefetch=0, the order will be fifo.

Note: the jdbc store does priority order [0-9]


On 21 March 2013 15:38, mikmela <mikmela@yahoo.com> wrote:

> The  http://activemq.apache.org/how-can-i-support-priority-queues.html
> <http://activemq.apache.org/how-can-i-support-priority-queues.html>  says
> that
> *For KahaDB three priority levels are supported, Low (<5), Default (=5) and
> High (>5).*.
> However, our tests show that messages with different priorities in the
> range
> < 5 (Low) where processed by consumer in proper order, not FIFO as we
> thought... Does it mean that desription is not uup-do-date and it was
> addressed at some point?
> Just want to make sure that we can rely on this behaviour and it not a some
> side effect?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Clarifcation-on-KahaDB-support-for-message-priority-is-needed-tp4665014.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
http://redhat.com
http://blog.garytully.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message