activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geurt Schimmel <GSchim...@schubergphilis.com>
Subject Re: load balancing
Date Wed, 13 Mar 2013 06:42:05 GMT
'Nob' expands to 'network of brokers'.
Indeed, using random=false for all my bridges.

Thanks
Geurt

Sent from my iPhone

On 13 mrt. 2013, at 02:10, "Christian Posta" <christian.posta@gmail.com> wrote:

> not sure what you mean with 3 nob's. you said earlier a two node network of
> brokers.
> do your producers/consumers use the failover url with random=true?
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Geurt Schimmel <
> GSchimmel@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> 
>> random=false. Actually, static bridges between 3 nob's, and to prevent
>> undesirable network pathes when all nodes are up, I'm using random=false.
>> 
>> Geurt
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On 13 mrt. 2013, at 01:41, "Christian Posta" <christian.posta@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I suppose you're using the failover URLs with random=true for all
>> clients?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Geurt Schimmel <
>>> GSchimmel@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I'm sending 100k messages of 200 bytes each to a network-of-brokers (2
>>>> nodes). Appears the load-balancing distribution is 83 vs 17. Guess this
>> is
>>>> the most effective way (from an ActiveMQ perspective) to process all the
>>>> messages, but there are situations where a more equal loadbalancing
>> would
>>>> be preferable. Are there parameters or ways to influence the
>> loadbalancing
>>>> behavior ?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Geurt
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> *Christian Posta*
>>> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
>>> twitter: @christianposta
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> *Christian Posta*
> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> twitter: @christianposta

Mime
View raw message