Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of juanin@gmail.com designates
 209.85.223.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAJL1ALtKbcTuuBHgMGm1xVdVMBPB97MQAjuzLkruJrf1YGt-8Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAJL1ALtKbcTuuBHgMGm1xVdVMBPB97MQAjuzLkruJrf1YGt-8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:08:05 -0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAL52o-0G_EsavJ2=HGcnS_ms+Gmzb4kEWDgUhamEE7scCaYzNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Apollo and server redundancy
From: Juan Nin <juanin@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f838b7b1e1eaf04d62d8439

--e89a8f838b7b1e1eaf04d62d8439
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Just read this article today, where it is described how to do it using
LevelDB:
https://github.com/fusesource/fuse-extra/tree/master/fusemq-leveldb#how-to-use-with-activemq-56

Regards

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Robert Borkowski <rborkowski@ideeli.com>wrote:

> Hello,
>
> We are currently using ActiveMQ in production, in master/slave
> configuration.
>
> Does Apollo support any form of multi-server redundancy? I can't find any
> mention of it in the documentation. Any thought of going beyond what
> Activemq does for redundancy?
> Ideally we'd like to be able to have an offsite copy of the queues for DR
> purposes, and the single master/single slave architecture prevents this.
>
> --
> Robert Borkowski
>

--e89a8f838b7b1e1eaf04d62d8439--