Return-Path: 
 <users-return-33708-apmail-activemq-users-archive=activemq.apache.org@activemq.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C841AEC4C
	for <apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:03:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 68291 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2013 18:03:02 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org
Received: (qmail 68254 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2013 18:03:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@activemq.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@activemq.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@activemq.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.activemq.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org
Received: (qmail 68233 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2013 18:03:02 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:03:02 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of christian.posta@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.223.169 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.223.169] (HELO mail-ie0-f169.google.com)
 (209.85.223.169)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:02:56 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 13so3489095iea.28
        for <users@activemq.apache.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:02:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=yOLDBhnXkKO92jfJEpJdbyvsUhTKuk+kX0FBC2h324w=;
        b=XuJoHEe4w6y0UJvnePDlwPNmIVs++Tz/Yogd0Risu0NzpgzPzGyhd6/WfQSXE2wm+F
         ifcf0yqLFwpRyLBcSRwbYNVPvujjxRf5iCzhGS+AFKu22G/uNj7j66mu2xVQvvJzqemb
         LIBZ62cqeRbHblfsW9YWXClcbd2pJDKxSfQlq12wkbyrFcL0bORMapg9eELG15qPlA25
         d78YiB/X1bNGJpSfIvR1R9Ii28oreP7KLy9DI322OCS1ycer7GYeLtidv6IGPq5OSHoU
         2JNtI6nov9Zw0pmlCE2r+H8kkxCtPqYc0QLakGlKywdB4AKJLK5VY49STH67Cg5ZPfD3
         5wJA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.212.74 with SMTP id ni10mr3901314igc.60.1361815355321;
 Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:02:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.50.41.41 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:02:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1361810715298-4664043.post@n4.nabble.com>
References: <1361799919460-4664025.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<CAKS7T5M41Y-gL1TMSK0N9NZgF=ZS-hCVobCP_kx5hn5N1i9VMw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1361810715298-4664043.post@n4.nabble.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:02:35 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAKS7T5OgWvV-hxRhTZpHfQKkoQ2EqGjAsPaRw9zv4ExE5TE_nw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: OutOfMemoryError due to TopicSubscription
From: Christian Posta <christian.posta@gmail.com>
To: "users@activemq.apache.org" <users@activemq.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae93410f980f7e104d69058f8
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--14dae93410f980f7e104d69058f8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

The network of brokers relies on advisory topics. Any good reason why you
have a separate bridge per destination?

My *guess* is you're using default config with default memory limits, and
since you have a lot of network bridges, thus separate advisory topic subs,
you're running out of memory.

If you post your complete config, we can see.


On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Ishitori <Ishitori@bk.ru> wrote:

> I don't use advisory topics, but I do use network of brokers. There are 2
> brokers and they are connected by network connector per queue basis. Here
> is
> the example:
>
>            <networkConnector
>                name=&quot;TopicsOnly-duplex&quot;
>                uri=&quot;static:(nio://&lt;ip>:62626)"
>                networkTTL="2"
>                prefetchSize="1"
>                duplex="true">
>                <dynamicallyIncludedDestinations>
>                    <topic physicalName=">"/>
>                </dynamicallyIncludedDestinations>
>             </networkConnector>
>
>             <networkConnector
>                name=&quot;SpecificQueue-duplex&quot;
>                uri=&quot;static:(nio://&lt;ip>:62626)"
>                networkTTL="2"
>                prefetchSize="1"
>                duplex="true"
>                decreaseNetworkConsumerPriority = "true"
>                suppressDuplicateQueueSubscriptions = "true"
>                conduitSubscriptions="false">
>                <dynamicallyIncludedDestinations>
>                    <queue physicalName=&quot;&lt;queue_name_here>"/>
>                </dynamicallyIncludedDestinations>
>             </networkConnector>
>
> And there are more networkConnector for each queue I have with same
> parameters. About 5 of them.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/OutOfMemoryError-due-to-TopicSubscription-tp4664025p4664043.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta

--14dae93410f980f7e104d69058f8--