Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 491CAE325 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:20:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86074 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2013 14:20:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 85998 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2013 14:20:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 85980 invoked by uid 99); 12 Feb 2013 14:20:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:20:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chubrilo@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.43] (HELO mail-bk0-f43.google.com) (209.85.214.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:20:19 +0000 Received: by mail-bk0-f43.google.com with SMTP id jm19so57411bkc.16 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 06:19:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bjxG1c6wAcfhye6pygIyxDIR9/0sZBItXHF0AxPVDLk=; b=XlYUtb94PyMeLn0JI7qZx8uSiCt74MmNTvF+qkN6UYHcZdha/bmazbDCYC9dHLqgUp dC0l1JGQSJY3dCd33z5uv0NiKTs3vBz6NW2IPTSJrJQpRgQ/7tzoDHh5LEuSyr4g50jj KpGk80jk1cvGlExfWfa2Prn/1MXsWUK9j8hM2vdK+0t4dyx3xnA42pNb+Ssognkeo1kH R03ej6pF4O/fbZAkcylAVb/pgvdzRDLCUXA+O3Z21rCdnxiJnJDKTUrrJPZ8/dP7sf0e bfvk3K6/LPC1SZPBWTNS3kQ7Na74/RZ8MX7FSMi2JlSNleyafN5FTkaMXIUY4mt7r0iB IVqg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.204.130.210 with SMTP id u18mr5314960bks.57.1360678797574; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 06:19:57 -0800 (PST) Sender: chubrilo@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.25.6 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 06:19:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:19:57 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WKa3Pfj7cyrD_el0RXS2BGo-RuQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: osgi manifest headers are missed in 5.8.0 release From: Dejan Bosanac To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Dmytro, with previous version you'd use activemq-core, which also contained all broker classes, so there's no much of a difference now. You only need to use activemq-osgi bundle instead of activemq-core one. There's an activemq-client feature among karat features that's supposed to be used if you're only interesting using a client-side stuff. Also, for the http transport you should use activemq-http feature (note that activemq-optional module doesn't exist anymore, so you should use activemq-http instead). Regards -- Dejan Bosanac ---------------------- Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat dbosanac@redhat.com Twitter: @dejanb Blog: http://sensatic.net ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Dmytro Pishchukhin wrote: > Hi Dejan, > > thank you for details. > > As I see, activemq-osgi contains all functionality (client, broker, > all transports, dependencies etc.). I'd like to use only small > functionality sub-scope (e.g. client + http transport). With previous > versions, I can use bundles/modules I need. With the latest version, I > have to include all functionality into my osgi framework and I don't > have any way to configure it. Of course, I can wrap the other activemq > jars and add osgi manifest headers on the fly, but it's not "off the > shelf" solution. Or did I miss something? > > > -- > Best regards, > Dmytro Pishchukhin > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Dejan Bosanac wrote: >> Hi Dmytro, >> >> we changed the modules of the activemq for 5.8.0 and how it integrates >> with osgi containers. You can find more details on it here >> >> http://activemq.apache.org/osgi-integration.html >> >> but in a nutshell, there's now activemq-osgi bundle that incorporates >> all classes and is ready to be used in osgi land. You can also take a >> look at karat features for 5.8.0 and see how it's deployed. >> >> >> Regards >> -- >> Dejan Bosanac >> ---------------------- >> Red Hat, Inc. >> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat >> dbosanac@redhat.com >> Twitter: @dejanb >> Blog: http://sensatic.net >> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Dmytro Pishchukhin >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've just found that ActiveMQ 5.8.0 artifacts do no contain OSGi >>> headers in manifest files. What was the reason to remove them? >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Dmytro Pishchukhin