Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC0EBE2EB for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:13:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58418 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2013 14:13:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 58255 invoked by uid 500); 12 Feb 2013 14:13:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 58233 invoked by uid 99); 12 Feb 2013 14:13:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:13:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dmytro.pishchukhin@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.43] (HELO mail-oa0-f43.google.com) (209.85.219.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:13:17 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id l10so114882oag.2 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 06:12:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=DEveM5XGRtiEjhvOTAnQZzFBANnX7ZiiWRRDmfIl80w=; b=GrAhGJjjLMHG0fOVIfRCldkSf6O+apLBSx5p1B7ByNO2JYv/J2h5JK1UDeQpswCNK5 os6564mF96cFfigyHzZf3oQ/dyVoNFVObhmVhS0Kma40DJ1eVCj5Tr9nR8zaLt2tMmoG B41SicBifcm3ULTX6eOUv4WSPTlWhEknCTUkg+dSl48U2GDuuCGvRizwjGSFaNJiyPJ9 pIl5c8epR0suP4qo3yN3yiDRUKDR9HTB7u9VGezMgcIqXmqNgbQXOmcbERYZXnlw7znv sMOinRsQK7GRaBbGJUSVHlTuIxfFpYzIEeyHVprenfdvlC603QlHc63D8gXdp4RsrX8C 3JFg== X-Received: by 10.60.29.193 with SMTP id m1mr13074929oeh.36.1360678376198; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 06:12:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.135.225 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 06:12:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Dmytro Pishchukhin Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:12:36 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: osgi manifest headers are missed in 5.8.0 release To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Dejan, thank you for details. As I see, activemq-osgi contains all functionality (client, broker, all transports, dependencies etc.). I'd like to use only small functionality sub-scope (e.g. client + http transport). With previous versions, I can use bundles/modules I need. With the latest version, I have to include all functionality into my osgi framework and I don't have any way to configure it. Of course, I can wrap the other activemq jars and add osgi manifest headers on the fly, but it's not "off the shelf" solution. Or did I miss something? -- Best regards, Dmytro Pishchukhin On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Dejan Bosanac wrote: > Hi Dmytro, > > we changed the modules of the activemq for 5.8.0 and how it integrates > with osgi containers. You can find more details on it here > > http://activemq.apache.org/osgi-integration.html > > but in a nutshell, there's now activemq-osgi bundle that incorporates > all classes and is ready to be used in osgi land. You can also take a > look at karat features for 5.8.0 and see how it's deployed. > > > Regards > -- > Dejan Bosanac > ---------------------- > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > dbosanac@redhat.com > Twitter: @dejanb > Blog: http://sensatic.net > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Dmytro Pishchukhin > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've just found that ActiveMQ 5.8.0 artifacts do no contain OSGi >> headers in manifest files. What was the reason to remove them? >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Dmytro Pishchukhin