Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B2E7E592 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:56:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53993 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2013 00:56:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 53963 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2013 00:56:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 53954 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jan 2013 00:56:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:56:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mohitanchlia@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.176] (HELO mail-ia0-f176.google.com) (209.85.210.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:56:35 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f176.google.com with SMTP id i18so1517435iac.35 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:56:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=biDX5wddagUtlbJhIDyuTH17wkFGdsaSLZRAB6CdhB0=; b=EES8q8io1tFBQ/4Z0dC+DNUKBi4ZIM2nC5gXIMkDYLBfCGqFT45HAFOylZFHK9c5Kq PuAAkqM02+spIdl8Oa1kKV21qiTYJh2pYATyr7p8Ak+qLf+gRrI3JC4euQVpboeKL5mJ rd9iqIdXPKWtNsipqPL4vLmHS8+xNg3BDZ6zPvO+J9KXaPVO2LNSxYfT1Vk3963vL/Ct stKTomwtxHO2nj8t98AejdCgFdYSWXOxhwNolhBoIaeRzOFrTxe8Z99r5YgjGezbuTkG oVqLQNakKXabiW61tEVU4Pf0qcAU4mWpM2LcSQij71PVjLCeIqx7yqa27UIKcaXJwy0v H5xA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.33.196 with SMTP id j4mr1978296icd.4.1359507374357; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:56:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.44.228 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:56:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:56:14 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Rebalance cluster clients From: Mohit Anchlia To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9d7bff41e3e6004d476fabe X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --14dae9d7bff41e3e6004d476fabe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks! Is there a downside of using rebalance? Also, does it cleanly kill client connections. Thanks for your help On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Christian Posta wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Mohit Anchlia >wrote: > > > Thanks! Is the feature still is rebalanceClusterClients=true? I tried > that > > and the client was hanging for some reason. > > > Yep. It should be enabled on the broker side only and the client should be > using the failover:() transport. > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Christian Posta < > > christian.posta@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > > > It's part of 5.7, ie, the features are available, but they are not > > enabled > > > by default. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Mohit Anchlia > > >wrote: > > > > > > > On this page it says that rebalanceClusterClients is only valid for > > 5.4? > > > Is > > > > this part of 5.7 by default and need not be configured? > > > > > > > > http://activemq.apache.org/configuring-transports.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > *Christian Posta* > > > http://www.christianposta.com/blog > > > twitter: @christianposta > > > > > > > > > -- > *Christian Posta* > http://www.christianposta.com/blog > twitter: @christianposta > --14dae9d7bff41e3e6004d476fabe--