activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mohit Anchlia <mohitanch...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Network of broker question
Date Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:53:19 GMT
I checked my message properties and they all have persistent=true in
activemq admin console. I also checked that the producers are
non-transacted. Is there a way I can look what's inside activemq's memory
and what state they are in?

I don't have a reproducible test case as I am still trying to figure out
how this happens in the application. I enabled debug logs on the
application and it seems to be doing the right thing.

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Christian Posta
<christian.posta@gmail.com>wrote:

> PFC can still affect the network bridge. We should figure out why messages
> are piling up (unexpectedly??). Do you have a test case that can reproduce
> this?
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Mohit Anchlia <mohitanchlia@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I think it might be because of this flow control message that I see
> between
> > brokers. Here pprfdaa300 is another broker. But why would this happen
> > between brokers though?
> >
> > 2013-01-03 14:44:21,587 | INFO  |
> > Usage(default:memory:queue://eventsEndpoint:memory) percentUsage=0%,
> > usage=0, limit=20971520,
> > percentUsageMinDelta=1%;Parent:Usage(default:memory) percentUsage=106%,
> > usage=22325599, limit=20971520, percentUsageMinDelta=1%: Usage Manager
> > Memory Limit reached. Producer
> > (ID:pprfdaa300.ind.net-51311-1351809358414-145227:1:1:1) stopped to
> prevent
> > flooding queue://eventsEndpoint. See
> > http://activemq.apache.org/producer-flow-control.html for more info
> > (blocking for: 6822s) | org.apache.activemq.broker.region.Queue |
> ActiveMQ
> > Transport: tcp://pprfdaa300.ind.net/10.145.67.135:61616@41478
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Christian Posta
> > <christian.posta@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> > > Can you post the config for the two brokers?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Mohit Anchlia <mohitanchlia@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > It's A <----> B
> > > >
> > > > Broker A has 2 messages but no consumers
> > > > Broker B has consumers but don't get messages forwarded
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Christian Posta
> > > > <christian.posta@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Can you explain how the brokers are set up? A ---> B ? and which
> has
> > > the
> > > > > messages and which has the consumer?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Mohit Anchlia <
> > mohitanchlia@gmail.com
> > > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > As I understand that if I have network of brokers than the
> messages
> > > > will
> > > > > be
> > > > > > sent to the broker that has active consumers on it. I have 2
> > network
> > > of
> > > > > > brokers and one of them has 2 messages and no client consumers
> and
> > > > other
> > > > > > one has consumers. I was expecting those 2 messages to be pulled
> by
> > > > other
> > > > > > broker for processing. Could you please help me understand why
> > those
> > > 2
> > > > > > messages wouldn't get processed?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > *Christian Posta*
> > > > > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > > > > twitter: @christianposta
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Christian Posta*
> > > http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> > > twitter: @christianposta
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Christian Posta*
> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> twitter: @christianposta
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message