Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gary.tully@gmail.com designates
 209.85.219.43 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAH+vQmOzZF8C2O8=k-FA8Mc71gRWvoKdpkxZPQE6aHt3wZLUSg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAL52o-3Cx2Tu=_0GBm31PGb6j3xmBQm_GPb0X0b84W4G8B-uhA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH+vQmOzZF8C2O8=k-FA8Mc71gRWvoKdpkxZPQE6aHt3wZLUSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:39:02 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CAH+vQmN3yYFjxe1VD2i3Mc+RX6EyjM2EZi_2Mh=Vab9Zxj5+mg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Broker and storage reference to persistence adapter,
 is this needed?
From: Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com>
To: "users@activemq.apache.org" <users@activemq.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54ee86e022dc904ce9ce43b

--bcaec54ee86e022dc904ce9ce43b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

fyi https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2064


On 16 November 2012 13:35, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com> wrote:

> correct, that issue was resolved a good while back.
>
>
> On 16 November 2012 13:29, Juan Nin <juanin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I just came across this article, where it's mentioned that you need to
>> "explicitly specify a persistence adapter within the configuration file
>> and
>> reference it from the broker and the storage definition":
>>
>>
>> http://open-source-adventures.blogspot.com/2009/01/limiting-disk-store-usage-with-active.html
>>
>> I guess that was maybe on the past and not needed nowadays, right?
>> I've never done such a configuration, and my storage definitions seem to
>> work fine.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Juan
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://redhat.com
> http://blog.garytully.com
>


-- 
http://redhat.com
http://blog.garytully.com

--bcaec54ee86e022dc904ce9ce43b--