Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C117D24A for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:56:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64836 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2012 11:56:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 64158 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2012 11:56:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 64094 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2012 11:56:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:56:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chubrilo@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.171] (HELO mail-lb0-f171.google.com) (209.85.217.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:56:28 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id gf7so11516492lbb.2 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 03:56:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Ipmd3iP+VEbQ9nSZsEjbSKcZSiEzA1AADuCil4f63ZI=; b=JOdKAOQLNfaKEjToAOC8zYIkYGzv9qW6GqICvSXs1O8CuTq6KCQekVJJ755lZonulx w5QI7Fx3JpHFbNqhwOvaz7cyJO1xa/9vsdGRGzAUT5JhXu2K+mlAuTXXO/HQMMzw7Kmw 77f9j+Hz0tl6mAyxsYFCvX5fkmbgqUQ/2OJB/PUK/66qZxMdr//uDNGfT88aqc22d+C2 NL/0pGZIw3Fp3/7Q2+zcxwyiIINvTsKXryiFpwSYMpGnDy3mzTF8CHbtbj0Mb6LGRWse KP7IUNtTUzKmAN/7lZP2H1oQ+96uwb393niOISgvX+nZD/98YbyxTdIrHZJWOke7/ef6 atig== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.24.161 with SMTP id v1mr9464677lbf.28.1354190167598; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 03:56:07 -0800 (PST) Sender: chubrilo@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.16.162 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 03:56:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1354180588627-4659927.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1354180588627-4659927.post@n4.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:56:07 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: yQi9pIJE_g3XzZ9jAbqJd6W8seY Message-ID: Subject: Re: ActiveMQ Authorization Performace From: Dejan Bosanac To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org You can use cached ldap authorization module http://activemq.apache.org/cached-ldap-authorization-module.html it caches all data in memory Regards -- Dejan Bosanac ---------------------- Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat dbosanac@redhat.com Twitter: @dejanb Blog: http://sensatic.net ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:16 AM, joesan wrote: > Guys, > > I"m looking for suggestions if I should consider using LDAP for > authorization? Does the authorization happen only once when my clients set > up their connection? or does it happen for every messages published or > consumed by the clients? > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Authorization-Performace-tp4659927.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.