Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of e.semog@gmail.com designates
 209.85.223.171 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1353763344483-4659721.post@n4.nabble.com>
References: <1353763344483-4659721.post@n4.nabble.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 14:43:18 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAGeZ+bgO+RkYrx4vkSXsmXYAZrOBv3n9dPt-XbFPFs5QpUDHvw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Apollo Openwire, Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ and Failover Transport
From: Jim Gomes <e.semog@gmail.com>
To: ActiveMQ Users <users@activemq.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f502fae372ff504cf456d71

--e89a8f502fae372ff504cf456d71
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Dean,

I haven't attempted connecting to Apollo via OpenWire yet, but I wouldn't
think that using failover would have any bearing on it.  Failover for NMS
is entirely a client-side implementation, and is not dependent upon the
server to do anything.  If you can connect without failover in the first
place, then you should be able to use failover.

Best,
Jim


On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 5:22 AM, dean.ward <dean.ward@bakedbean.org.uk>wrote:

> Hi all,
> I'm attempting to use Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ with Apollo 1.5's Openwire
> protocol support. Does anybody know if the failover transport is supported?
> I'm using this simple connectionstring...
>
> failover:(tcp://localhost:61613)
>
> And I get the following error...
>
> ConnectionError: Unspported command: class
> org.apache.activemq.apollo.openwire.command.ConnectionControl :
>
> Any pointers would be greatly appreciated!
>
> Thanks,
> Dean
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Apollo-Openwire-Apache-NMS-ActiveMQ-and-Failover-Transport-tp4659721.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

--e89a8f502fae372ff504cf456d71--