activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Juan Nin <jua...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Broker and storage reference to persistence adapter, is this needed?
Date Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:13:29 GMT
thought so, awesome, thanks for the quick reply!   :)


On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com> wrote:

> fyi https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2064
>
>
> On 16 November 2012 13:35, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > correct, that issue was resolved a good while back.
> >
> >
> > On 16 November 2012 13:29, Juan Nin <juanin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> I just came across this article, where it's mentioned that you need to
> >> "explicitly specify a persistence adapter within the configuration file
> >> and
> >> reference it from the broker and the storage definition":
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://open-source-adventures.blogspot.com/2009/01/limiting-disk-store-usage-with-active.html
> >>
> >> I guess that was maybe on the past and not needed nowadays, right?
> >> I've never done such a configuration, and my storage definitions seem to
> >> work fine.
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance.
> >>
> >> Juan
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://redhat.com
> > http://blog.garytully.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://redhat.com
> http://blog.garytully.com
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message