Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of claus.ibsen@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.215.43 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAH+vQmPGCN1=P6mjV6MsayrJizsiacpthYdZ7CEghg4mCBb8Qw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1350891205152-4658031.post@n4.nabble.com>
 <CAH+vQmOPdhRq=+WKnO4icQRzR85XHyo4aPOyh=_G2-9amxrkmw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1350903685782-4658040.post@n4.nabble.com>
 <CAH+vQmPGCN1=P6mjV6MsayrJizsiacpthYdZ7CEghg4mCBb8Qw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Claus Ibsen <claus.ibsen@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:55:03 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAGB5yNnkhPz+uN3MSQd6ysvOq59GyAdVwk8u9gXhbTFXezeVVg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Issues with KahaDB persistence in ActiveMQ 5.6.0
 (IndexOutOfBoundsException, IllegalStateException)
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com> wrote:
> KahaDB is the current default persistence provider, and kaha will be
> depreciated in the future.
>

Gary I think you should log a JIRA about this. Then we can start
getting the message out to the community that the old kaha is
deprecated, so ppl dont start using it on new projects.


> I agree, the naming is a little confusing, it reflects something of
> the evolution of the stores.
> There was jdbc, then amq store, then kaha, then kahadb.
>
> KahaDB has been hardening for the past 2 years, since 5.3.  It is the
> recommend choice for file based persistence.
>
> On 22 October 2012 12:01, Pauli Kaila <pauli.kaila@napa.fi> wrote:
>> It indeed seems that there are two different Kaha persistence adapters, the
>> KahaPersistenceAdapter and KahaDBPersistenceAdapter. So what you are saying
>> is that the KahaDBPersistenceAdapter should work better? Or were you just
>> pointing out an error in my previous post (me talking about KahaDB instead
>> of Kaha)?
>>
>> The fact that there are two so similarly named persistence adapters is quite
>> confusing. Perhaps other one should be deprecated.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Issues-with-KahaDB-persistence-in-ActiveMQ-5-6-0-IndexOutOfBoundsException-IllegalStateException-tp4658031p4658040.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> --
> http://redhat.com
> http://blog.garytully.com


-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Email: cibsen@redhat.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen