activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sean K <sk92...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Does the jms vs amqp comparison article have any feedback from activemq?
Date Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:19:21 GMT
Thanks.

These postings hits the Mark Richard's article right on the bull's eye.

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Christian Posta
<christian.posta@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sean K,
> Looks like you already got a response from James :)
> But here's at least one discussion that took place a while ago about this
> very subject:
>
> http://www.jroller.com/RickHigh/entry/amqp_versus_jms
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Sean K <sk92129@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Has anyone responded to this article written by Mark Richards about
>> AMQP and JMS (includes ActiveMQ)?
>>
>> Specifically:
>>
>>
>> "This means that message clients using AMQP are completely agnostic as
>> to which AMQP clients API or
>> AMQP message broker you are using."   -- I remember hearing something
>> like that about Java -- Write once, run everywhere -- which was a lie.
>>
>> Or, "While it is true vendors such as SonicMQ, ActiveMQ, and HornetQ
>> provide some level of cross platform interoperability, they do so
>> through proprietary protocols, APIs, and client libraries.   ..."   My
>> thought is -- is this really true?   I thought all of ActiveMQ is open
>> source via Apache, thus it should be another standard that should be a
>> louder standard than AMQP.
>>
>> Last, how different is openwire protocol from the AMQP protocol?
>>
>> Can anyone respond to these issues, or point me to articles that
>> address these from the ActiveMQ point of view?
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Christian Posta*
> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> twitter: @christianposta

Mime
View raw message