activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Raj <raja.vedamoor...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: #AMQ-3353: Durable subscribers on durable topics don't receive messages after network disconnect
Date Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:39:11 GMT
Hello guys

I just want to know, if there is a  way to remove messages from queue/topic (Enqueued Messages)
once the   Consumer ( MessageListener) receives the message?

I need this because, the MessageListener is picking up the earlier published messages. Thank
you.

Raj

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 8, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Raja vedamoorthy <raja.vedamoorthy@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Thank you Gary I will check.
> 
> --- On Fri, 9/7/12, Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> From: Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: #AMQ-3353: Durable subscribers on durable topics don't receive messages
after network disconnect
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Date: Friday, September 7, 2012, 5:58 AM
> 
> There is reference to a unit test in that jira
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3353), does it correctly
> reflect your use case and the issue.
> 
> the test is:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12485386/DurableSubscriberWithNetworkDisconnectTest.java
> 
> If it does, then please reopen the issue and we will try and get to it for 5.7
> 
> Note:
> With dynamicOnly=true, a durable sub is recreated by the bridge when
> there is new demand, so when a remote durable sub registers again.
> With dynamicOnly=false, a durable sub is recreated on bridge startup,
> so that messages flow to the remote broker irrespective of connected
> consumers.
> 
> 
> On 7 September 2012 11:13, Andreas Calvo <andreas.calvo@scytl.com> wrote:
>> Wrong link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3353
>> 
>> El vie 07 sep 2012 11:57:12 CEST, Andreas Calvo escribió:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> We are still affected by this issue.
>>> 
>>> Taking a look at the code, it seems that upon undesired disconnection
>>> and reconnection, all durable subscribers affected are lost.
>>> Using JMX we're able to see how the NC is lost and not successfully
>>> recreated.
>>> 
>>> However, we've identified that even standalone brokers in a NoB are
>>> affected by this issue, and did do not successfully reconnected to
>>> each other.
>>> 
>>> I'll try 5.7-SNAPSHOT, but we've been following this issue since 5.5
>>> and now it's marked as resolved.
>>> 
>>> Link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3393
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Andreas Calvo Gómez
>> Systems Engineer
>> Scytl Secure Electronic Voting
>> Plaça Gal·la Placidia, 1-3, 1st floor · 08006 Barcelona
>> Phone: + 34 934 230 324
>> Fax:   + 34 933 251 028
>> http://www.scytl.com
>> 
>> NOTICE: The information in this e-mail and in any of its attachments is
>> confidential and intended solely for the attention and use of the named
>> addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
>> copying,
>> distribution or retaining of this message or any part of it, without the
>> prior
>> written consent of Scytl Secure Electronic Voting, SA is prohibited and
>> may be
>> unlawful. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender
>> and
>> delete the material from any computer.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://fusesource.com
> http://blog.garytully.com

Mime
View raw message