Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B12DD492 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:12:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77920 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2012 19:12:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 77894 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2012 19:12:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 77886 invoked by uid 99); 22 Aug 2012 19:12:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:12:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sk92129@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.171] (HELO mail-ob0-f171.google.com) (209.85.214.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:12:25 +0000 Received: by obqv19 with SMTP id v19so1917589obq.2 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:12:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VaT3mcWT/MV1Ai13YYrOzi6oL4R2RDawmfG9GfWOv4Q=; b=j8/k7tt9q0ywRCHEO5eBnYi3RhlvRJTDYCcqqtz6ULn1IZmtwDHaTkVRBhBgfCRD/M BLLBSNS1VVni5cE9gb02zJWq491VB4T4ca8JINhJdvb2R9sM3jmrXI8M+0xdgu64Z6+/ fI/xgCYenRpeP8LOhPeiEkdyLyNhr/VlOmLG3XZuGkmig0BsSFjUZtm09zm2xeDh+vjO uC609VYOsw7u0YHA7fCE4mILRKZf2TXBsscC8qBepFlDo1k6/+/IAMtTQIB46Sda/9Uy 5hBlbFP8kIShTQwCzerBXxiH5pvfwarkCwTjtS4VOF0w3/6DdE2HWJnhJae5NLLXcIj4 qv7w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.117.71 with SMTP id kc7mr16290028obb.62.1345662724580; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:12:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.83.68 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:12:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:12:04 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: iptables and broker to broker transport From: Sean K To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I have two centos machines up and running. When I disable or turn off iptables, the one broker can establish a transport bridge with the other broker on the other centos machine. I noticed that the port number being used changes -- 53033, 53067, etc.. How can I configure each broker in the static network of brokers in a way so that I can re-enable iptables? I prefer to keep iptables running for security reasons -- not that it is the best security out there