Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lorber.sebastien@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.216.171 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAH+vQmPg8uA99ig2oqRs=MT3M_ut_TsMfsj0YXFsPTfW7KrvHg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CADvQ-brcCjcTsR4EQ4zQqhhFNyM3HdPhWcDRRxPophNNW1DSew@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+GjePUXnt9P7oA0u+c=qwTDrUOY2jw31o-ZYTbgsFdQx_3Q3g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADvQ-bqP+PwW2SsDj2GjgQnujHF=GosoOgeS29HCNViP_g8G7Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH+vQmPg8uA99ig2oqRs=MT3M_ut_TsMfsj0YXFsPTfW7KrvHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 21:58:31 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CADvQ-bp_1-Lh5-C=jw=YT4G2Sry3Lfys87GnzP2Co3iYCeO-1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ has too many dependencies?
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Lorber?= <lorber.sebastien@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300fb30105caf004c844c06c

--20cf300fb30105caf004c844c06c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sweets, thanks,

Finally i was not alone thinking this about fuse-leveldb :)

2012/8/27 Gary Tully <gary.tully@gmail.com>

> that is fixed on trunk with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-389=
0
>
> On 27 August 2012 20:19, S=E9bastien Lorber <lorber.sebastien@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Yes i know and i have excluded the problematic fusemq-leveldb
> >
> > But wouldn't it be better to put this dependency as optional so that
> users
> > wouldn't have to do themselves the exclusion?
> >
> > Because retrieving hadoop, scala... that's pretty "heavy" for just the
> > leveldb feature, and will cause conflicts for jetty users because of
> hadoop
> > core dependencies. It took me some time to figure out i was having 2
> > different versions of the same Jetty lib in my classpath...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/8/27 Greg Thomas <greg.d.thomas@gmail.com>
> >
> >> On 27 August 2012 15:53, S=E9bastien Lorber <lorber.sebastien@gmail.co=
m>
> >> wrote:
> >> ...
> >> > And it will produce conflicts by default to many jetty users like me=
 i
> >> > guess.
> >>
> >> This has come up before; I think
> >>
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/activemq-users/201206.mbox/%3CCA=
+GjePWRZn-ZgY0=3DEg3Bjmi8zXQhnYYa36us7FMK684Eh_CSDg@mail.gmail.com%3E
> >> gives a list of exclusions you can apply.
> >>
> >> Greg
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> http://fusesource.com
> http://blog.garytully.com
>

--20cf300fb30105caf004c844c06c--