Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68BC1DB7D for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:41:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20984 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2012 23:41:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 20898 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2012 23:41:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 20886 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2012 23:41:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:41:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.139.250.139] (HELO joe.nabble.com) (216.139.250.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:41:31 +0000 Received: from [192.168.236.139] (helo=joe.nabble.com) by joe.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T7EMH-0004gz-MC for users@activemq.apache.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:41:09 -0700 Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:41:09 -0700 (PDT) From: boday To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1346370069658-4655864.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: starvation with JMSPriority queues MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org lets say I have a single (slow) consumer from a priority queue and I produce mostly high priority messages to it...will low priority messages ever get processed (based on duration in the queue, etc)? I know there are workarounds (manually promoting, resequencers, using multiple queues, etc), but am curios about the default behavior and any AMQ settings to get around starving low priority messages indefinitely. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/starvation-with-JMSPriority-queues-tp4655864.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.