Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.139.250.139 is neither permitted
 nor denied by domain of zackhasit@gmail.com)
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: zackhasit <zackhasit@gmail.com>
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Message-ID: <1345480110863-4655304.post@n4.nabble.com>
Subject: Implementing Request Response mechanism
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I looked at
http://activemq.apache.org/how-should-i-implement-request-response-with-jms.html

However I have a question on this. I have multiple clients and a servers.
Each have their own local broker. Client needs to send message to server's
broker and setJMSreply to it's own (client's) local broker.

Idea being that receives by client and servers are done on their local
brokers but sending is done to remote brokers. That way clients do not have
to check responses from multiple server brokers in round robin manner.

Example:
1. Client sends message to servers broker setting up response dest to be
client's broker's ip
client (IP:xx.xx.xx.xx) --------->server's
broker(IP:yy.yy.yy.yy)--->server(IP:yy.yy.yy.yy)

2. Server responds back to client's local broker.
client (IP:xx.xx.xx.xx) <----client'
broker(IP:xx.xx.xx.xx)<---------server(IP:yy.yy.yy.yy)

Is it possible today ? How is this achieved via code in example above? I
don't want brokers to talk to each other because I would like to know when
other side is down right away.

Thanks


--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Implementing-Request-Response-mechanism-tp4655304.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.