activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From mikmela <mikm...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Problem with TransactDatabaseLocker's lock statement
Date Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:36:51 GMT
Have you seen this simple select *SELECT * FROM ACTIVEMQ_LOCK WHERE ID=1*
working for MS SQL Server?
It doesn't for me in terms of master/slave synchronization (i.e. slave is
not blocked on this select) unless I do something like this *SELECT * FROM 
ACTIVEMQ_LOCK(rowlock, updlock, REPEATABLEREAD) WHERE ID=1*...

If anyone have successful implementation of MASTER/SLAVE configuration for
MS MSQL Server, please share details...

--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Problem-with-TransactDatabaseLocker-s-lock-statement-tp4653552p4653773.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message