Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 34FEE95D8 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33181 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2012 10:09:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 32858 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2012 10:09:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 32841 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2012 10:09:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:09:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gary.tully@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.50] (HELO mail-qa0-f50.google.com) (209.85.216.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:09:21 +0000 Received: by qafl39 with SMTP id l39so2171973qaf.16 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 03:09:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=g5oEfdc7/beVYumjh9roHVttyTSbX/sSiEId73Ps70w=; b=MV69+dAE7eewY1gtNgRAteg2lkU/XcyBLoMdp6J2celt5PJQ5EZxFFtwbfmQT2IEX2 Ntoji6DvodV3Ofl2BXQZsSYkcjrpi2++L9gMd9++zoxs3IbI3cXh81E8lpd/BkgVH94T 22tjWrWY3/MRdoeVzIUsHJqagdgwT03FTJj/OMHfLpvGmdjJuWqO9ZTLe4v2dWxKXRu1 5X5hwn2rixYoyrVfTqpnaYHMDK0ZAXqDnHJKT6QtpAP77i0b9oa1cKb5M/ygTVKVa3pQ h+jCKydoqP2O/ehqG5oiszDqgWaxsCS+rDUJ/MZkGU4JHftJLCvoaCreUElrOjb+jEqy 6Tfg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.181.83 with SMTP id bx19mr3003652qab.79.1339668541239; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 03:09:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.237.196 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 03:09:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1339597645656-4653252.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1339597645656-4653252.post@n4.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:09:01 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: AMQ 5.6 NIO Transport & Interceptors Problem From: Gary Tully To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org it is not a known issue. Can you provide some more information on which exact callback is being ignored? On 13 June 2012 15:27, BocaJim wrote: > Hello all, > > I am having a problem, we have an interceptor that adds a custom security > layer to AMQ that we've been using an 5.4 and 5.5, when we use it in 5.6 its > OK, but when I change the transport from tcp to nio, we no longer get > callbacks, and the connections lockup and don't complete... > > Is this a known issue on 5.6 that interceptors don't work with NIO? > > Thanks > Jim > > -- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-5-6-NIO-Transport-Interceptors-Problem-tp4653252.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- http://fusesource.com http://blog.garytully.com