activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Raul Kripalani <r...@fusesource.com>
Subject Re: Performance: queues/topics vs. selectors
Date Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:32:27 GMT
I suggest you go for the one-destination-per-chatter model, and perhaps
enable automatic deletion of inactive destinations to control the use of
resources in an elastic manner.

Look at http://activemq.apache.org/delete-inactive-destinations.html.

Hope that helps.

Regards,

*Raúl Kripalani*
Principal Consultant | FuseSource Corp.
raul@fusesource.com | fusesource.com <http://www.fusesource.com/>
skype: raul.fuse | twitter: @raulvk <http://twitter.com/raulvk>,
@fusenews<http://twitter.com/fusenews>
blog: F3 - Flashes From the
Field<http://blog.raulkr.net/?utm_source=fusesourceemail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=fusesourcemail>

<http://twitter.com/fusenews>

On 5 June 2012 06:25, Shine <activemq@club.webhop.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> thanks for your response.
>
> There will be ~250 clients and all clients are almost connected at the same
> time. All messages expire after 150 seconds.
>
> best regard
> Shine
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Performance-queues-topics-vs-selectors-tp4652915p4652971.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message