activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From mickhayes <mickha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ActiveMQ database lock problem
Date Tue, 29 May 2012 14:21:50 GMT
I think it's best if you share as little as possible between the two brokers.
In this case, you are trying to share the port (in time). 

As an alternative to your configuration, could you use a different port for
each broker, and the failover transport on the client side?

Would that be good enough for your case?

If however, you still wanted to delay the startup of the second broker, I
would say that the only satisfactory end condition for the delay would be
that the socket is in state CLOSED. 


-----
Michael Hayes B.Sc. (NUI), M.Sc. (DCU), SCSA SCNA 

--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-database-lock-problem-tp4652786p4652791.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message