activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ceposta <christian.po...@gmail.com>
Subject NetworkConnectors and Master/Slave failvoer
Date Mon, 30 Apr 2012 22:47:34 GMT
quick question about the network connectors/bridge and failover. seems the
static discover is sufficient to handle failovers as it will poll the slave
in a master/slave network of brokers. seems the polling is configurable
also. is there any reason to use the failover() mechanism when establishing
a network of brokers pointing to a master/slave? Torsten mentions such a
thing in his blog for the purposes of reducing the warn logging when the
polling to the slave times out. are there any drawbacks to using it for
static discovery? 

-----
http://www.christianposta.com
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NetworkConnectors-and-Master-Slave-failvoer-tp4599619.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message