activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ceposta <>
Subject NetworkConnectors and Master/Slave failvoer
Date Mon, 30 Apr 2012 22:47:34 GMT
quick question about the network connectors/bridge and failover. seems the
static discover is sufficient to handle failovers as it will poll the slave
in a master/slave network of brokers. seems the polling is configurable
also. is there any reason to use the failover() mechanism when establishing
a network of brokers pointing to a master/slave? Torsten mentions such a
thing in his blog for the purposes of reducing the warn logging when the
polling to the slave times out. are there any drawbacks to using it for
static discovery? 

View this message in context:
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at

View raw message