activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From mickhayes <mickha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Message rate comparison with RabbitMQ
Date Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:42:58 GMT
You can look at the specJMS2007 published results here: 
http://www.spec.org/jms2007/results/jms2007.html

but the results aren't normalized so they cannot be directly compared. 
Note for example the HW used by RHEL, and compare with that used by the
other test runs.

At the risk of stating the obvious:

It always costs more to handle more messages. 
It always costs more to handle larger messages.
It always costs more to persist messages to disk.
Faster HW/SW does the same things faster, or more things in the same time. 



-----
Michael Hayes B.Sc. (NUI), M.Sc. (DCU), SCSA SCNA 

--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-rate-comparison-with-RabbitMQ-tp4575958p4579935.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Mime
View raw message