Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADD7799BF for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:47:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35610 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2012 01:47:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 35586 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2012 01:47:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 35557 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2012 01:47:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:47:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.1 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of srodrigu85@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.45] (HELO mail-wg0-f45.google.com) (74.125.82.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:47:49 +0000 Received: by wgbds10 with SMTP id ds10so402052wgb.14 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:47:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=taQ+QKpxuIW8FCQAzrJ1syLYys0XAccNs0vCVKyJXK8=; b=mk3/NQjEg81sKGYEQikV9tbVRiidxa8cdjVK6kpmXhFMAnmTdyUewrfbYsTn9m255q kt+zM+LnRMEHe0CiT8iKMY7VD5RC5bE96Vnaq/cJ9vCySEapXT7UCgGVDawPMezHzK2k 9yNC1BFEchBwVPoK3gjpczo8x4vGx0mH3qdIjLdduufJrb0zb3IxSrFgcKdG0F6oS705 uwFo928v9yuVJ+y5xpZ+d/tqmPOnFvhgN3SjyAxPatUh7OvIjSXH+e1cXhowVxfuQMyZ rZIfiofds5fB2tNF3WUkb7XpNO8ftB/xoBh21YglJzidKSeLGdEJcMjV/RXLNnIWDaGr 50aw== Received: by 10.216.197.211 with SMTP id t61mr16281375wen.1.1332899249125; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:47:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.69.144 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:46:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1307107420.86937.1332511158885.JavaMail.root@mail1> <1332819499080-4507874.post@n4.nabble.com> From: Sebastian Rodriguez Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:46:58 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: AMQ 5.5 - compression on network of brokers To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d99b9543f84904bc43cac8 --0016e6d99b9543f84904bc43cac8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Ha you tried list this for the network connector connection string? wrote: > a network connector keeps an open tcp 'openwire' connection to its > peer. This receives advisory demand information about consumers and is > used to forward(send) messages when required. > The protocol can be changed to http if that is easier to propagate > through a firewall. > You can introduce parallel connections by adding an additional network > connector. > > On 27 March 2012 04:38, hodgesz wrote: > > I would vote for that enhancement. Just out of curiosity what is the > format > > the messages are currently forwarded over tcp to the network of brokers? > Do > > the brokers maintain an open tcp connection to each other? > > > > I am just trying to understand what kind of performance to expect if the > > brokers are in different data centers. > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > -Jonathan > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-5-5-compression-on-network-of-brokers-tp4498914p4507874.html > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > -- > http://fusesource.com > http://blog.garytully.com > --0016e6d99b9543f84904bc43cac8--