activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From lzr <jsw...@163.com>
Subject Re:Re: 10 seconds wait time for kahadb lock
Date Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:45:31 GMT
Could you please to interpret how the parameter affect the performance of ActiveMQ?


thanks a lot,
Zhuran Li



At 2012-03-21 22:54:14,"Dejan Bosanac" <dejan@nighttale.net> wrote:
>Thanks for closing the loop!
>
>Regards
>-- 
>Dejan Bosanac
>Senior Software Engineer | FuseSource Corp.
>dejanb@fusesource.com | fusesource.com
>skype: dejan.bosanac | twitter: @dejanb
>blog: http://www.nighttale.net
>ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
>
>
>On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Pvbouwel <peter.vanbouwel@contribute.be>wrote:
>
>> To be clear for other people wanting to change the wait time for kahadb
>> lock:
>> dejanb his answer was 100 % correct.  I had a typo in my configuration
>> file.
>> If you want to change the time-out just change persistenceAdapter in your
>> activemq.xml to look like:
>>
>>
>>
>> The value of databaseLockedWaitDelay is in miliseconds so this
>> configuration
>> will wait 1 second before trying a new attempt to get the lock.
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/10-seconds-wait-time-for-kahadb-lock-tp4488418p4491519.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message