Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C3EBC9BBA for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 19:23:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40556 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2012 19:23:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 40448 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2012 19:23:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 40440 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2012 19:23:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:23:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=5.0 tests=SPF_SOFTFAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of abimael_oliveira@hotmail.com does not designate 216.139.236.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:23:48 +0000 Received: from joe.nabble.com ([192.168.236.139]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rt2Fj-00079Z-FL for users@activemq.apache.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:23:27 -0800 Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:23:27 -0800 (PST) From: Abimael To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1328210607463-4352501.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <4F202389.5030004@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Activemq Clustering and failover MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I had the same issue and unfortunely it seems that it is back . My test applications are not equals of you, as I am doing some tests about failover and H.A. using 2 simple applications. But, the bottom line is : when master goes down, you (and me) want that the slave start working properly AND ,both Producer and COnsumer continue work. But , doing my tests looks like that the Consumer just stops and finishs when Master goes down . I had opened another thread here, where I mention that I realized the issue . I mentioned there that (or I realized) that the "start method invocation " should be just after the connection creation : connection = factory.createConnection(); connection.start(); I did the change in the code. And I recall that it was working . But, for some "kind of catasthrofe" to me, it is not working and , now, I do not know if I did some change in the configuration (xml change) or something or anything else. Going crazy with failover configuration .(and little bit dissapointed as failover is very important for any enterprise messaging setup and I am realizing it is not simple and it is not easy as ApacheMQ site states ) regards -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Activemq-Clustering-and-failover-tp4326849p4352501.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.