Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0592E9B74 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 13:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52863 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2012 13:19:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 52777 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2012 13:19:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 52769 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2012 13:19:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:19:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.139.236.26 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of tomerb@waze.com) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:19:39 +0000 Received: from joe.nabble.com ([192.168.236.139]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsa5m-0004Ic-Dk for users@activemq.apache.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 05:19:18 -0800 Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 05:19:18 -0800 (PST) From: tomerb To: users@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1328102358409-4347806.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <6814f79f.95c0.135346856b4.Coremail.suonayi2006@163.com> References: <1328001270340-4343907.post@n4.nabble.com> <6814f79f.95c0.135346856b4.Coremail.suonayi2006@163.com> Subject: Re: Reply:network of broker - update and rebalance not working MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org figured out the problem (at list on my env) when a broker updates another broker that it is up, it identifies itself by the server name. once the server name of all brokers was added to /etc/hosts on the client side, all was well :) I guess this is bad practice, and the broker should identify itself by ip and not by hostname I was running activeMQ 5.5.1 on ubuntu 10.4 -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/network-of-broker-update-and-rebalance-not-working-tp4343907p4347806.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.