Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FF2D96A7 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:10:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93740 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2012 15:10:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 93650 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2012 15:10:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 93638 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2012 15:10:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:10:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chjohnst@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.43] (HELO mail-bk0-f43.google.com) (209.85.214.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:10:33 +0000 Received: by bkar1 with SMTP id r1so2279203bka.2 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:10:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=gPacIZZjoq3R9R/BdFUCFEPSNGBJjf3rTPiuYmxOVuc=; b=eNBk4ZMrV5Omip69d/nZXzFsMfWlROqR7aIX9ASRw93RhdhIvNmlHPolK2qie48Sm2 WQv4rSXEBDIYWe/jqOba7Fxe0aWXekdg32efXxBomSATo5FolbIcMIUlTlABqVtjTOZ6 KzQzkPasyZ+5c2633XYZv5gxA9pDv3GBZdEf0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.26.67 with SMTP id rl3mr5192923bkb.45.1327417812755; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:10:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.60.84 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:10:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1327413663463-4323801.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1327404145188-4323506.post@n4.nabble.com> <1327413663463-4323801.post@n4.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:10:12 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: No network bridges started in Network of brokers. From: Christopher Johnston To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf301ee81132a3cd04b7478b57 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf301ee81132a3cd04b7478b57 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Are you looking to do a mesh? Not sure your config looks right and I believe you need a TTL of at least 2 with duplex enabled. Think of a minimum 3 nodes setup, your config for each node should have networkConnectors pointing to each other to maintain the mesh and ability to failover. As you scale out more nodes, just continue to layer the networkConnectors pointing to each other. Thats how my setup is now with (6) nodes spread out across my datacenters. Node 1) A -> B A -> C Node 2) B -> A B -> C Node 3) C -> A C -> B On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Laures wrote: > My Config for Cluster-Node 03 (Replication-Master) > http://pastebin.com/9iztG67D > TTL is default (documentation says thats 1), no duplex > > every cluster node uses pure master slave. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/No-network-bridges-started-in-Network-of-brokers-tp4323506p4323801.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > --20cf301ee81132a3cd04b7478b57--