Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 914A09AB6 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 11:01:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30097 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2012 11:01:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 29801 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2012 11:01:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 29775 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2012 11:01:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:01:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chubrilo@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.45] (HELO mail-ww0-f45.google.com) (74.125.82.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:01:40 +0000 Received: by wgbds13 with SMTP id ds13so353522wgb.14 for ; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 03:01:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=i5pDsij6R7yQ1NnrHtoqyQXGh1mqZSGprgnZYak/t1k=; b=uQezalNwKW/CqrrhGQ/dgXiINJIVI5BUVsyX14uAgy9B6QDJd5yus/7HQFIiIInE7/ /E+HG9LjByHYM6kNT3/680RG0ru3Pf1Za/ynMdbZ7+JmXNu2QxYvONNxhEDthid/hW5E QRFLGvnMoXnjtv02n/u9P/aDcW2XThcz9g6cY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.204.130 with SMTP id fm2mr1345829wbb.13.1325761280210; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 03:01:20 -0800 (PST) Sender: chubrilo@gmail.com Received: by 10.223.93.144 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 03:01:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 12:01:20 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3G0ap_jI5zxU7GrRz5gdntLmHTE Message-ID: Subject: Re: Checking that slave is up From: Dejan Bosanac To: users@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151744899429f90b04b5c5dae7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00151744899429f90b04b5c5dae7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It does, and you have "Slave" JMX attribute on broker object. Regards --=20 Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb ----------------- The experts in open source integration and messaging - http://fusesource.co= m ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Stevo Slavi=C4=87 wrote= : > Hello ActiveMQ community, > > Is there a way to check that a slave, in shared filesystem storage > master/slave setup which is awaiting lock to become available, is up? Doe= s > JMX interface start early enough, before lock is acquired? > > Regards, > Stevo. > --00151744899429f90b04b5c5dae7--