activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
Subject Re: should I use trunk or patch 5.5.1?
Date Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:16:23 GMT
Trunk should be pretty stable at the moment. You can test the latest
snapshot for starters (
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/)
and see how it goes.

Regards
-- 
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
-----------------
The experts in open source integration and messaging - http://fusesource.com
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net


On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:04 PM, mserrano <martin@attivio.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I need the fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3542.
>
> Should I try to patch 5.5.1 up as needed to include the fixes for it?  Or
> should I use trunk?  I'm not sure how
> stable trunk is or how close 5.6 is to shipping.
>
> Thanks,
> Martin
>
> p.s.  I'm trying to deal with a situation where I'm using master/slave plus
> networked brokers.  When the master fails (or is shutdown shortly after
> startup), the associated slave does not pick up the consumers that are
> registered elsewhere on the network.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/should-I-use-trunk-or-patch-5-5-1-tp4262847p4262847.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message