Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D5BB9E91 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:09:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86271 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2011 08:09:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-activemq-users-archive@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 86197 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2011 08:09:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 86189 invoked by uid 99); 18 Nov 2011 08:09:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:09:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of suonayi2006@163.com designates 220.181.13.80 as permitted sender) Received: from [220.181.13.80] (HELO m13-80.163.com) (220.181.13.80) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:09:23 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=Received:Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject: MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=TQRiZP7Czuk6wfqJeAR6UQoPdavGWZASFz 4fxby6Uuk=; b=V98eaboQgQhjlGRUL3ZngamG56Fgez/BXvfvT5icNc+vQwwX+U T/7wH0PkoBfpavnHSg/bKyvJ4M3nejcHfUepW1zJaLperovBGlRrT4zt4o7Vz9NJ nKONqrl+iM+//rBIlVxhwGre5TJ8JUk2GwTxkHuMaGmxVtLV0T3bUIADs= Received: from suonayi2006 ( [203.119.80.8] ) by ajax-webmail-wmsvr80 (Coremail) ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:09:00 +0800 (CST) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:09:00 +0800 (CST) From: SuoNayi To: Activemq Message-ID: <7f87af2c.1eff6.133b5b8b48e.Coremail.suonayi2006@163.com> Subject: AMQ does not respect the message priority order completely? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_604839_1065742491.1321603740814" X-Originating-IP: [203.119.80.8] X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Coremail Webmail Server Version SP_ntes V3.5 build 111110(15680.4167.4075) Copyright (c) 2002-2011 www.mailtech.cn 163com X-CM-CTRLDATA: WLowlWZvb3Rlcl9odG09Mzg4Ojgx X-CM-TRANSID: UMGowEApqkOdEsZOgeVFAA--.2386W X-CM-SenderInfo: xvxr0td1lsiiqw6rljoofrz/1tbiEB37GkiNc2R+XQABsc X-Coremail-Antispam: 1U5529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7vcSsGvfC2KfnxnUU== ------=_Part_604839_1065742491.1321603740814 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GBK Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, I'm not sure this is correct or not. In order to respect the message priority order more sufficiently vmcursor which keeps all messages references in memory is recommended, because messages are read from message store or cache and ordered and dispatched to consumers in batches. ------=_Part_604839_1065742491.1321603740814--