activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Green <>
Subject Re: HTTP transport
Date Tue, 08 Nov 2011 07:56:34 GMT
This is of interest to me too.

Could use a description of it's behaviour which that page does not provide.


On 8 November 2011 01:45, Jason Dillon <> wrote:

> ... is this any good?  I keep getting folks in the backseat making
> tunneling over HTTP a meta-requirement.  Are there any significant issues
> with using the http[s] transport in the activemq-optional module for this?
>  Will use of it totally kill performance?
> Documentation is a bit weak here, I've just found this:
> Which points to a bunch of other places which point out issues.  I'm
> unsure what is resolved and what is still pending.
> I'm going to play with it and run some tests, but I was curious if the
> community has collected any intel on use of this transport already?
> --jason

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message