activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
Subject Re: HTTP transport
Date Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:31:21 GMT
No, http transport is JMS compliant

Regards
-- 
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
-----------------
The experts in open source integration and messaging - http://fusesource.com
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net


On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:47 PM, James Green <james.mk.green@gmail.com>wrote:

> Are there operational disadvantages to using HTTP transport?
>
> I am thinking in terms of things like acknowledgements - behavioural
> changes like Stomp vs Openwire.
>
> James
>
> On 8 November 2011 10:14, Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi there are quite some folks that are using it in production, so it's
> > stable enough.
> >
> > The main reason to use this protocol is if you need to go through some
> > firewall and you can't let regular openwire traffic through it. It will
> > basically use XStream to marshal messages to XML and send them using http
> > to the broker.
> >
> > Hope this helps.
> >
> > Regards
> > --
> > Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
> > -----------------
> > The experts in open source integration and messaging -
> > http://fusesource.com
> > ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> > Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:56 AM, James Green <james.mk.green@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > This is of interest to me too.
> > >
> > > Could use a description of it's behaviour which that page does not
> > provide.
> > >
> > > James
> > >
> > > On 8 November 2011 01:45, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > ... is this any good?  I keep getting folks in the backseat making
> > > > tunneling over HTTP a meta-requirement.  Are there any significant
> > issues
> > > > with using the http[s] transport in the activemq-optional module for
> > > this?
> > > >  Will use of it totally kill performance?
> > > >
> > > > Documentation is a bit weak here, I've just found this:
> > > >
> > > > http://activemq.apache.org/http-and-https-transports-reference.html
> > > >
> > > > Which points to a bunch of other places which point out issues.  I'm
> > > > unsure what is resolved and what is still pending.
> > > >
> > > > I'm going to play with it and run some tests, but I was curious if
> the
> > > > community has collected any intel on use of this transport already?
> > > >
> > > > --jason
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message